What I don't understand is why some of you vote for this turkey. Afterall did you not read the news about Brett and his distortion of, or the outright trashing of the truth when it came to the "endorsements" he received from the likes of Tammy Baldwin, Mark Pocan, Spencer Black, and Fred Risser.
For example there was an article in the Istmus titled: Spencer Black rescinds endorsement of Hulsey
written by Jack Craver in 2010 http://www.thedailypage.com/daily/artic ... icle=31084
that said in part: “”Says Rep. Black, "The quote attributed to me in that mailing is not my quote. In fact, when Brett Hulsey asked if he could attribute that quote to me (one that I had never written or said) I made it clear he could not, since it is not my words."
In an email in which Mayor Dave Cieslewicz was cc'd, Spencer wrote, "Remember that breakfast that Mayor Dave and I had with you to tell you that you had a problem with trustworthiness. This is an example why. I never said the statement was fine. I said just the opposite. You can't use a statement that I didn't write. I don't let people put words in my mouth."”
There are many other articles just like that one pointing to Hulseys apparent lack of truthfulness or trustworthiness.
Did some of you vote for him because he parroted the green, progressive philosophy? Sad that people still fall for someone who talks the talk but who hasn't got the personal character to walk the walk.
The real question should be: Will liberal/progressives in his district find someone else to run against Brett or will they stick with their guy?
I would say find someone who can tell the truth.