Stu Levitan wrote:Cornbread
Did you read Transmittal No. TANF-ACF-IM-2012-03
I do love how technical you can sometimes be Stu. Really, that takes time and attention to detail, which I appreciate.
But with all your showing me the individual trees, you keep missing the woods in front of you.
Remember my post on "the secretary" in socialist obamacare's 150lbs of paper? Why all the hubub? Most of what that was about is "the secretary" will at some point in time in the future will decide........
Lotsa power in a non elected position don't you think?
So....did zerobams just use some "secretary" (HHS?) to cast aside the a law written by congress and signed into law by former president clinton? So no matter what the law is, as constitutionally constructed, it can be changed by one person's "interpretation", via a "secretary" he appointed?
And didn't obama order his "secretary" (DHS?) state that the federal government would no longer cooperate/support local police officers regarding the supreme court ruling that supported states rights in policing illegals?
And didn't obama state that his (soon to be indicted) 'justice' dept will also no longer enforce the DOMA law of 96? Come to think of it, clinton signed that into law too. Does barack hate clinton or is he just a fascist pig?
quoting the fascist piglet hisself:
Some people want me to bypass Congress and change the laws on my own. That’s not how our system works. That’s not how our democracy functions. That’s not how our Constitution is written.
So, did someone else write that for him to read on his ever present teleprompter and he's just an idiot, talking bubble head?
We've been told this empty suit is some constitutional genius (but we have zero records of anything by him), so one would think he knows what he read, no? But then again, in trying to help out his deeply troubled head of the justice dept, the racist pig eric holder, he should know when one can use "executive privilege" and when he can't.
what's the view where you are, stu?
Are you really opposed to any of these things?
Yup. Leftist/progressives have such a horrid history, any sane person wouldn't trust them.
Are you really opposed to the feds giving the states more flexibility to pursue such goals?
I think the federal govt should only do things like national security, postal service, and the like. Other than that, they should let this Confederation of States be. State's Rights. Let us decide. That black hole of DC needs to be started to filled in. State wise, it's more representative, so the black hole of WI--madison/milwaukee are also being filled in, so hopefully they can actually work on their own, make their own money instead of confiscating it from elsewhere in the state. I'm all in favor of the working family, the working man and woman, the taxpayer, so we agree on this?
So what are you so upset about?
Not upset at all. Just feel like someone walking down the street in berlin, 1930s, is all.