MOBILE USERS: m.isthmus.com
Connect with Isthmus:         Newsletters 
Thursday, November 27, 2014 |  Madison, WI: 22.0° F  Overcast
Collapse Photo Bar

Wisconsin GOP and violence against women

Please limit discussion in this area to local and state politics.

Re: Wisconsin GOP and violence against women

Postby rabble » Sat Aug 25, 2012 10:10 am

Meade wrote:The answers were more honest than the question.

You do realize that the question you're refusing to answer doesn't mention "war," right?
rabble
Forum God/Goddess
 
Posts: 6473
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 7:50 pm

Re: Wisconsin GOP and violence against women

Postby Meade » Sat Aug 25, 2012 10:16 am

.
Last edited by Meade on Sat Aug 25, 2012 10:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
Meade
Forum God/Goddess
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 6:26 pm

Re: Wisconsin GOP and violence against women

Postby Meade » Sat Aug 25, 2012 10:18 am

rabble wrote:I'll answer them all, if you answer the first one.

It's dishonest because it begs the question in its opening: "Serious question for the BUT CLINTONS PENIS crowd:"

BUT CLINTONS PENIS crowd. Get it?
Meade
Forum God/Goddess
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 6:26 pm

Re: Wisconsin GOP and violence against women

Postby Bland » Sat Aug 25, 2012 10:24 am

Meade wrote:
rabble wrote:I'll answer them all, if you answer the first one.

It's dishonest because it begs the question in its opening: "Serious question for the BUT CLINTONS PENIS crowd:"

No, that's who the question is for, it's not part of the question. There is nothing honest about your conversational style. NOTHING.
Bland
Forum God/Goddess
 
Posts: 1009
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 1:46 am

Re: Wisconsin GOP and violence against women

Postby Meade » Sat Aug 25, 2012 10:28 am

It's part of the question because it qualifies who the question is being asked of.
Meade
Forum God/Goddess
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 6:26 pm

Re: Wisconsin GOP and violence against women

Postby Prof. Wagstaff » Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:09 am

I have a question, just out of the blue, and anyone can answer:

Do you think that either Bill Clinton or Ted Kennedy would be elected today if their proclivities or scandals were out there for people to talk about?

I know it's speculative, I'm just looking for an honest answer.
Prof. Wagstaff
Forum God/Goddess
 
Posts: 9020
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2002 6:35 pm

Re: Wisconsin GOP and violence against women

Postby Meade » Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:11 am

Prof. Wagstaff wrote:I have a question, just out of the blue, and anyone can answer:

Do you think that either Bill Clinton or Ted Kennedy would be elected today if their proclivities or scandals were out there for people to talk about?

I know it's speculative, I'm just looking for an honest answer.

Today? No. Not elected. Reelected - they might.
Meade
Forum God/Goddess
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 6:26 pm

Re: Wisconsin GOP and violence against women

Postby Cornbread » Sat Aug 25, 2012 6:27 pm

Henry Vilas wrote:madison. com/ct/news/

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Great job! Madison's leftist 'wisconsin' state journal's more leftist, capital times, posting this in theirs "news" section? :lol: :lol:

Great to see "old clowns never die". Keep posting your leftist 60s, boomer stuff.

Image
Cornbread
Forum God/Goddess
 
Posts: 688
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 5:48 pm
Location: Various places

Previous

Return to Local Politics & Government

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

moviesmusiceats
Select a Movie
Select a Theater


commentsViewedForum
  ISTHMUS FLICKR
Created with flickr badge.

Promotions Contact us Privacy Policy Jobs Newsletters RSS
Collapse Photo Bar