Connect with Isthmus:         Newsletters 

Friday, December 26, 2014 |  Madison, WI: 37.0° F  Fair
The Paper
Share on Google+
Wisconsin's faith-healing law faces fresh scrutiny
Weston girl's preventable death could prompt a reassessment
Everest Metro Police Chief Dan Vergin: 'She got sicker and sicker until she was dead.'
Everest Metro Police Chief Dan Vergin: 'She got sicker and sicker until she was dead.'

The death early this week of a young Wisconsin girl from a treatable form of diabetes, whose parents prayed over her rather than seek medical help, could re-ignite a debate over a state law that essentially shields such activity from criminal prosecution.

So says the Madison-based author of When Prayer Fails, a new book about parents who, for religious reasons, refuse to provide medical care for their children.

"Maybe the statute will get tested out soon," muses Shawn Francis Peters, who teaches writing and U.S. history at the UW-Madison.

Peters is referring to state statute 948.03(6), against failing to act to protect children from bodily harm. It contains an exemption for what it refers to as " Treatment through prayer." To wit: "A person is not guilty of an offense under this section solely because he or she provides a child with treatment by spiritual means through prayer alone for healing in accordance with the religious method of healing … in lieu of medical or surgical treatment."

The Wisconsin case concerned an 11-year-girl in Weston, in Marathon County. According to an Associated Press account, the girl withered away from diabetic ketoacidosis, suffering from such symptoms as nausea, vomiting, excessive thirst, and loss of appetite.

"She just got sicker and sicker until she was dead," the local police chief, Dan Vergin, is quoted as saying.

The girl's parents, Dale and Leilana Neumann, who do not belong to any organized faith, purportedly prayed over her, believing even after her death that she would be resurrected. They chalked up her death to their own lack of faith, said Vergin.

The case remains under investigation and will be reviewed for possible charges by the Marathon County district attorney.

But the state's law, which Peters mentions in his book, could make that difficult. Peters, in an interview, says the law likely found its way into the statute books through the efforts of Christian Scientists, as in other states with similar exemptions. But while some other states have rescinded these statutes, Wisconsin's remains on the books.

The statute drew some attention in 2003, when a two-year-old autistic child in Milwaukee was crushed to death during an attempted exorcism. The practitioner was convicted, albeit of a lesser offense than what some felt was appropriate. Afterwards, Milwaukee County District Attorney E. Michael McCann urged state lawmakers to remove this exemption, lest it lead to what he called "mischief." Wisconsin's do-little Legislature has not done so.

In an email, Dane County District Attorney Brian Blanchard says he thinks there have been cases where doctors and hospitals, "concerned that asserted religious beliefs of parents might result in physical harm to an ailing child," have asked the courts to step in. But "no one can recall" a Dane County case where a faith-based refusal to seek treatment was presented as "potential criminal child neglect."

Blanchard outlines the high threshold such a case would have to meet: "In the criminal child neglect area, we look for evidence of criminal thinking, not just inattention or momentary lapses in judgment. So, for example, if we had a baby death due to failure to thrive or treatable illness, and there was a claim that religious belief prevented the caretaker from seeking treatment, we would certainly ask police to be alert to any facts suggesting that religion was being used only as an after the fact excuse or ruse. That would of course be criminal thinking.

"If on the other hand the religious belief appeared genuine and there were no other signs of abuse or neglect, it might be difficult for us to say a case had merit as a criminal child neglect prosecution."

In other words, if you kill or maim your kids because you truly believe they need prayer more than medical attention, there's not much authorities around here can or will do about it.

"The way the statute is worded, I think he's right," says Peters. "The statute says if you treat a child by religious means, you're not going to be prosecuted." He adds, somewhat superfluously, that he thinks the statute should be written differently: "I think my book sort of illustrates the perils of that."

Peters has written three books, all about the dangerous intersection of Religion and Law. The first two dealt with the refusal of Jehovah's Witnesses to salute the flag or serve in the military (Judging Jehovah's Witnesses, 2000), and the refusal of the Amish to educate their kids past grade school (The Yoder Case, 2003).

When Prayer Fails, published by Oxford University Press, is a compelling and often shocking book. There is the anecdote of the little girl who died from a tumor in her eye that enlarged to the size of her head; investigators found blood smears in her home from where she had apparently dragged her tiny body along walls. There are cases of children who died from choking on food or ailments that could have been easily treated with a shot of insulin or dose of antibiotics. Some true believers have even refused treatment from communicable diseases, putting others at risk.

Note: This report updates a story about When Prayer Fails by Peters that was published Tuesday.

Share on Google+

Log in or register to comment

Select a Movie
Select a Theater

Promotions Contact us Privacy Policy Jobs Newsletters RSS
Collapse Photo Bar