Mobile? Click HERE for m.isthmus.com
Connect with Isthmus on Twitter · Facebook · Flickr 

Thursday, September 2, 2010 |  Madison, WI: 74.0° F  
The Paper
 

OPINION

Wisconsin needs to rein in payday loan outfits
Curb their exploitation



Article Tools: Read moreRead more Opinion items
Email this articleEmail this article
Print this articlePrint This Article
Email the authorEmail the author
Recommend This ArticleLike This Article Add to DiggShare this item

When I heard that state Rep. Gordon Hintz, a Democrat from Oshkosh, was introducing a bill to cap the interest on payday loans at 36%, I was excited. Finally, I thought, someone is doing something about this unchecked industry.

Wisconsin's lack of regulation has led to annual interest rates of more than 500%, and too many stories of down-on-their-luck people unable to pay back their loans. That, in turn, leads to ever higher interest charges, which sometimes drive people into taking out new loans. It can be a sticky trap.

The 36% cap in Rep. Hintz's bill, AB 392, is based on a similar law enacted federally to protect members of the armed services, who, sadly, were disproportionately affected by payday loan rates. This seems like a reasonable limit for everyone.

Of course, that's not what the industry would have you believe. Make one negative remark about payday loan practices and the shills come out in force with well-polished lines, like the ones in response to my recent blog post.

Hintz's bill, one person insisted, "would destroy the industry [and] the payday loans are needed in some situations."

Capping interest rates at 36%, they said, would make it impossible for the lenders to stay in business. Never mind that this is higher than the original cap Wisconsin had on the books before the Legislature chucked it in 1995.

The defenders say these loans are typically meant to be paid back in just two weeks, so even 500% annual interest on a small loan for that period doesn't add up to much. But, as Rep. Hintz pointed out to me, "Reports show that about 50% of borrowers aren't able to pay it off in just two weeks, so then we're not talking about a short-term loan anymore."

And then I heard from a young man who manages a payday loan store in Wisconsin. He told me something that changed my thinking on this issue.

The young man, who for obvious reasons asked to remain unnamed, didn't think the rate cap was the best way to go. I was suspicious until he explained, "The issue with the industry is not necessarily the percentage rate of the loans, but the fact that Wisconsin has no regulation for the length of term."

The latter, he argued, would be far more useful in helping keep people out of trouble.

New Mexico, for example, has capped the duration of payday loans at 14 to 35 days, after which no additional interest can be charged. That state also limits loan amounts to 25% of the borrower's gross monthly income.

That's a reasonable restriction and one that would hold the payday loan industry accountable to its own talking points. If capping the interest rate at 36% is unreasonable because loans are only supposed to be short-term, then making sure those loans are short term shouldn't be an issue.

Wisconsin should take whatever reform it can get, and you know it won't come easy. Any regulation, including Rep. Hintz's bill, will be met with strong opposition and lots of lobbying dollars. (The industry spent $158,100 in just the last two legislative terms.)

The proliferation of payday-loan and check-cashing stores, plus the ever-rising number of people who find themselves in a spiral of debt because of them, are symptoms of our nation's greater financial woes.

Beyond proper regulation, we need to start educating vulnerable populations about using more reputable providers like banks and credit unions. In turn, those places should do more to offer reasonable micro-financing and short-term loans.

When the vulnerable are targeted for exploitation, the whole community suffers. Right now, our community is hurting, badly, and we need to do everything we can to address the problems caused by bad business practices.

Emily Mills is a local writer and musician. She blogs at www.lostalbatross.com.

Comments (4)

From Jeff Kursman on 09/14/09 at 9:27 am

Ms. Mills -

As a musician, would you perform publicly without practicing first? Maybe you should focus on providing melodies rather than doling out inaccurate financial advice unless you're going to conduct thorough research so you can speak with an educated voice.

Payday loans exist because of banks and credit unions.  That's right, your "more reputable" providers charge customers 4-5 times more for a short-term loan than payday lenders....they're called overdrafts.

More than 75% of account holders overdraft at least once a year, with 5% overdrafting 9 or more times.  The average overdraft fee is now $27 according to the FDIC(study published in Dec '08 so the fees have actually increased), on an avg. overdraft of $36.  This equates to a charge of $0.75 or higher per dollar borrowed vs. $0.15-0.20 for a payday loan.

Your "vulnerable populations" are making an educated financial choice.  I agree that the proliferation of payday lenders is representative of the broader economic environment in which we live, but consumer demand for a product is what drives growth.

Examine the states that have passed $36% rate caps and effectively abolished the payday lending option.  Their residents now pay an average of more than $300 in additional bank and credit union fees annually!

 

From Emily Mills on 09/14/09 at 2:09 pm

So anybody who's not a "financial expert" is allowed to have an opinion about these kinds of issues? Seems silly to me.

And you missed the point of the article. I called the cap legislation a good conversation starter, but moved on to loan term regulation as what I feel would be a better option to tackle the overall problem. What's your take on that, then?

Believe me, I'm fully aware that plenty of banks take undue advantage of their patrons through excessive fees. Better regulation of those institutions is in order as well. Of course, not all of them are terrible. The credit union to which I belong charges very reasonable fees, and also makes available affordable short-term loans. So not only do I have access to that form of credit, but I get an insured savings account to boot. That's important. We need more of that for everyone, and to achieve it, we need better regulation and better financial education for everyday folk like you and me.

From Jeremy Midthun on 09/14/09 at 4:29 pm

Regarding:  "That's right, your 'more reputable' providers charge customers 4-5 times more for a short-term loan than payday lenders....they're called overdrafts"

Overdrafts are not short-term loans. Overdraft fees are penalties doled out for those who either (a) make a mistake and over-draw on an account, or (b) consciously decide to over-draw on an account. In most cases, this is a courtesy to a customer. Without overdrafts, any attempt to over-draw on an account could be denied.

Are they UTILIZED by Joe Q. Public as short-term loans? Yes. Are "reputable" institutions willing to overlook the overdraft and collect the fee? Yes.

But that does not make them short-term loans...

 

 

From Arvin Jones on 09/17/09 at 9:09 am If we're going to rein these in, are we going to rein in the country's biggest banks, as well, because they've been readily offering the same kinds of products. You can't just settle for the low-hanging fruit, but recognize that there is real demand to be met here, and that it won't just go away if you shut your eyes.

Log in or register to comment

moviesmusiceats
Select a Movie
Select a Theater
PluggedcommentsViewedForum
Promotions Contact us Privacy Policy Jobs RSS
Collapse Photo Bar